Sunday, February 20, 2011

Standing With Planned Parenthood

Voices of reason, from the floor speeches on the Pence Amendment which seeks to deny federal funding to Planned Parenthood:



And yet more, voices of reason:

Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY)

I hear that we must punish Planned Parenthood by defunding them because they’ve committed a number of sins; sin No. 1, they are large abortion providers, even though none of those abortions are paid for by the federal government.

Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ)

To me that is just an incredible statement, because essentially what you're saying is, we'll extort this. We don't really care about all these other services that they're providing, what we really care about is abortion. And if you sign on the dotted line, then you can continue to perform the other healthcare services, as long as you don't perform the service that is allowed under the law of the land.

Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT)

This is not about abortion. The Hyde amendment is the law of the land. Federal funds cannot be used under this provision to provide abortions. What this is about is whether primary and preventive care is going to be extended, oftentimes to poor people, but also to vulnerable middle class people by Planned Parenthood clinics throughout this country, including 10 in Vermont that are doing a tremendous job for people who really need this care.

Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY)

I stand here tonight in lieu of hundreds of women in the State of New York, most of them Republican women, who financed, who spoke for, who founded the agency of Planned Parenthood. New York was being filled with an influx of new citizens to America and Planned Parenthood allowed them to space their children so that there would be healthier children and healthier mothers. And we have all benefited from that.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA)

When you look at this carefully, this is trying to punish Planned Parenthood. But the ones who get punished are the people who won't be able to get the family planning services and the preventive screening services that Planned Parenthood regularly provides, and they won't be the only provider for many of these women because they have nowhere else to go if they can't afford to go see a private doctor and pay for it.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY)

This amendment is not merely anti-choice. It is also anti-health, anti-woman, and anti-poor, and is a thinly veiled attack on birth control. This amendment will not do anything to grow our economy or create any new jobs to help us out of this great recession. It will only turn this Nation backwards.

Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX)

But this is not about abortion. This is about family planning and counseling services that have long been part of the Planned Parenthood family. And all we'll do by cutting these resources will be, in fact, going back to the dark ages when young women had no place to go. So Planned Parenthood does not equate to abortion. Family planning does not equate to abortion. Title X funds do not equate to abortion because the law of the land is clear. But what we will have are young women who will have no place to go to be able to ask questions.

Susan Davis (D-CA)

Mr. Chairman, I'll bet the American people are really surprised tonight because we are debating a continuing resolution when they are facing tremendous challenges. We should be thinking about them and about the challenges they face. We should be talking, as my colleague has said, about how to save money and about how to create jobs. Instead, we are debating an amendment that will do neither. It will undermine women's health.

This amendment denies women access to reproductive care, and it attacks the health providers that they rely on in their communities. These are health providers that are serving the underserved, and we are spending the evening attacking them.

Progressive Patriot Girl

Thanks to the wonderful work done at the Library of Congress, we can all read transcripts of floor speeches given by those who do the work of the people.  Check it out, and see what your representatives are saying in your name. Voices of reason, or not.

No comments:

Post a Comment